Validation Isn’t Everything

Validation Isn’t Everything – Like it or not, industry jargon often coughs up terms that become buzzwords. When this occurs  web development is no exception, the terms can become diluted, even ambiguous. Two such terms lately include “validation” and “web standards.”

To be clear, the W3C provides specifications and recommendations, not mandates. In a rigorous sense, it can be argued that true web standards do not exist: they are a myth. Scary word! But don’t be alarmed. Don’t confuse myth with falsehood. So-called “web standards” are a myth in the sense that they describe an oft-repeated ideology that strives to establish popular convention.

Thinking optimistically, we might call these an ever-evolving ideal, something we as a community are still working toward perfecting. What we have, at present, are de facto guidelines, principles that serve an objective without being legally enforceable.

If a house’s wiring and electrical components are not UL-listed, the home inspector may refuse to issue occupancy permits. When ISO compliance isn’t met, products don’t ship. These are high stakes. On the other hand, in the face of invalid web markup, websites march on. The overwhelming majorities of surfers don’t bat an eyelash and don’t need to.

Provided the developer has written functional markup, failure to meet W3C validation means nothing more than the fact that a document contains something that is either not in the specification or is in disagreement with the specification. Invalid markup is therefore not necessarily in violation of anything.

These strong words—“invalid,” “violation”—may pack a punch to the layman, but in context of the web developer’s lexicon, they reflect markup that may be an addition to the specification or something the validator simply doesn’t recognize. Certain JavaScript that is universally understood by user agents, for example, does not appear in the HTML specifications.

Let’s not misunderstand. Poorly formed HTML can be a hassle to update. It may be a factor in search engine optimization (whose “standards” change often, to the chagrin of SEO subject matter experts). In some cases, it can cause content to load slowly (or appear to load slowly).

Validators are great for quickly spot-checking possible deal-breaker gaffes among copious volumes of markup. But validators are servants, not masters. W3C badges are effectively academic badges of honor. Such validation is an admirable enough goal, but is not always worth the return on investment in a production environment. Far more important is to ensure that markup is efficiently written.

Let’s see if the big boys agree.
Google and Yahoo! handle some of the thickest traffic on the market. As of this writing, neither site complies with the W3C validator. How about heavy-hitters CNET and eBay? Failed. Adobe’s and Macromedia’s websites? Failed. What about and

These are the home bases of open-source developers who themselves rely on evolving quasi-authorities like the W3C … but no; these sites fail, as well. How about Staffs of Netscape Communications Corp. are members the W3C, after all, and Netscape is responsible for JavaScript, one of the worlds’s most widely used client side technologies. Yet their site does not comply.

Surely, the site of the esteemed usability guru, Jacob Nielson, is compliant. Surely! Guess again. W3C validation is not the web developer’s Holy Grail. Validation does not guarantee a site will look the same from platform to platform, from browser to browser. Validation does not assure that markup is efficiently written or adheres to a given entity’s assessment of best practices. What it means is that the developer has coded a functional document and used no markup in addition to that specified by the guidelines.

Wearing suspenders in addition to a belt isn’t illegal, it’s just … extra.
No harm in that, is there?

Published 2001
Contributed by David Stiller @

Virginia Website Development Experts


Visionefx President Ricardo Vidallon has been in the creative business of design advertising, branding, marketing, cable broadcast, animation and the World Wide Web for more than three decades.

Web Maintenance Support Virginia

Visionefx, knows its important to keep your Web site, contact forms and database humming along 24/7. We support and maintains your business web site as your very own 'personal web master'.

Wheeler Real Estate
Sentara Fitness
Cambridge Global
Buffalo Trail Cabins
Wilson Hajek Lawfirm
Emtech Laboratories
Virginia Association Cardio Vascular Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Corner Cafe Portsmouth
Virginia Imports
Southall Landings Marina
Relay Electric LLC
Gastrointestinal Liver Specialists of Tidewater
EPM Emergency Planning Management
SCA Consulting Engineers
Gontarek Eyecare
Whitlock Brothers Inc.
SAG Stewart Goodson Advisors
Atlantic Dermatology
Norva Barber Supply
Faith Finder
Chesapeake Bay Helicopters
SMITH Engineering
Archwood Mortgage
Steam Showers 4 Less
Gastroenterology LTD
Asthma Allergy Docs
Hofferflow Controls
Perrine Consolidated Companies
Clarke Dolph PLLC
Sykes Bourdon Ahern Levy PC
Military Divorce PC
Virginia Appellate Analysis
Livinius Advisory
A1 Cash Advance
Festavius Group
Commonwealth Water Treatment
TriCities Funeral Services
Worth the Wait Boutique
Artistic Flooring
Seaward Marine Corp.
Bryan Electric
Independence Landscaping
US Army Mantech
PD Systems
Consolidated Steel
Clark Roofing and Siding
Tiffany Yachts
Stroud Pence Engineers
Odell Winkfield Roseman Shipp
PACE Collaborative
Peerless Carpet Care
Marathon Resource Management
Pelican Bay Plumbing
Care Connect HR
Pluribus International
Whirlpool Bathtubs
Steam Saunas 4 Less
Atlantic Billing
Enspire Energy
Cayman Dolphin House
Farm at Southriver
Kitchen Corps
Norflok Bearings
CITA Shipping
Dr. Grenga
ELS Photography
All Pest Control
Edery Technologies
Minecraft Seed Tours